Archive for the ‘Teaching Ideas’ Category

Dealing with Cell Phones and iPods in the Classroom

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

I allow cell phones and iPods in class. It’s never been an issue for me because I don’t make it about trust or control. That’s why the school from the image below and this micromanaging principal have both had so many problems. Instead I make it an issue of respect and personal productivity. I became an educator to teach, foster growth, and have fun. Not to police.

School Problems with Bad Cell Phone Policy

School Problems with Bad Cell Phone Policy

So here’s how I deal with cell phones and iPods. It’s fun, it embraces 21st century technology, it teaches students to be respectful, and it teaches them how to manage their time and attention productively.

Rule #1. Absolutely no one can use phones or iPods when someone has the floor.

This means whenever a classmate is speaking, I’m speaking, or something else comes up that is “floor worthy” – which means that it deserves undivided attention and respect – cell phones and iPods are off limits.

I explain that this isn’t just a school thing; it’s real world etiquette (often I have to explain what etiquette means too).  You wouldn’t show up to a business meeting with head-phones in your ears. You wouldn’t dare stop your foreman from explaining his instructions in order to reply to a text. And you’d be ticked off if someone ignored something important you were saying to check their phone or iPod. It’s about respect.

Rule #2. You can use phones or iPods when it’s individual work time.

I like the message of autonomy that this sends out to my students; however, I include this caveat:

“Listen, when it comes to work and school you can be doing one of two things: getting ahead or getting behind. So think about that when you scroll through your music to build the best playlist ever, or text your friend about whatever so and so said.”

Then, when I see them really wasting time in class with their iPod or cell phone, I’ll just shout out and say, “Hey, Julie, are you getting ahead or getting behind?”

And the answer is almost always a mumbling, “Behind.”

And I reply with, “And what do you think you should really be doing?

“Getting ahead.”

“Then you know what to do.” And nine times out of ten they put their phone/iPod down and get back to work.

I like this because it makes the issue positive and keeps it in their control. It’s fun, constructively embarrassing for some, and a good, experiential way to remind them that they’re not being productive.  I remind them that they – and only they – are in control of themselves. They can do whatever they want, but a lot of what they do is counter-productive to their own goals and desires and dreams.

Rule #3: If you violate rule #1, the class stops to support your addiction.

Because, at the end of the day, that’s what it is: an addiction. Sneaking a peak (at the phone/music-player) instead of respectfully paying attention can be explained really well as a compulsion – a bad habit that hijacks the person.  I explain this way of looking at cell phones and iPods to my students in advance. I explain that a great way of overcoming addictions is with a support group. And, with a big knowing smile on my face, I explain what happens when someone violates Rule #1 (i.e. uses their phone/iPod when someone has the floor). Here’s the procedure:

  1. Whatever was happening in class stops.
  2. The violator comes to the front of the class with his or her phone/iPod.
  3. The violator faces the class, holding his or her phone/iPod in the air, and repeats the following sentences after me:
  4. “Hello, my name is Johnny (for example).”
  5. I get the class to say, “Hi Johnny.”
  6. Violator says, “I’m up here because I have a cell phone and/or iPod addiction.”
  7. Class says, “We’re here for you Johnny.”
  8. I usually say (again, in good spirit), “It’s OK Johnny, there’s lots of addicts out there. Don’t feel like you’re all alone.”
  9. Then the “addict” leaves his or her phone/iPod either on my front table or back desk (wherever I can keep an eye on it in case of theft).

And sometimes, if the student is a good sport and I catch them gazing at their phone/iPod afterwards, I’ll tease them a bit with something like,

“It’s tough isn’t it? Has this been the longest you’ve gone without it for a while? Remember, we’re here for you.”

This gets the class laughing but also reminds the other ‘would-be-addicts’ to think twice before whipping their phones/iPods out when they shouldn’t.

Again, this method is fun, it embraces 21st century technology, it teaches students to be respectful, and it teaches them how to manage their time and attention productively … something so important in this information age with its endless distractions.

Please feel free to leave comments and/or ask questions!

Making Change Unstoppable

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Although I don’t think social change is for everyone, I do think you need the following ingredients in place before anything can happen:

  • Some “thing” worth getting behind (e.g. the song in the video is worth dancing to),
  • At least one incredibly confident individual willing to go it alone (e.g. “Dancing Man” from the video),
  • At least one or more people ready to stand behind ‘the leader’ and show the crowd, “Hey, this is good, come on!” (e.g. the first two guys to join Dancing Man).

Check it out:

So, the next time you’re thinking of instigating or supporting some type of social change – whether it be big change like starting an industry trend or small change in your school or workplace – be sure you have the necessary ingredients.

You’ll be “unstoppable.”

And you’ll have people like the woman at the very end of the video asking, “How did he do that?”

What’s Your Time Perspective?

Monday, July 6th, 2009

In an earlier post, I explained how I begin all my courses – regardless of the subject matter – with a lesson that challenges my students to think about their lives into the future in order to make what they’re doing today more meaningful. It makes my teaching more effective. It makes their learning more relevant. It makes education more meaningful.

This TED Talk on “Time Perspective” not only supports that lesson, but it’s given me lots to think about – both personally and as an educator.

  • It’s fast; you’ll likely need to pause it (like I did) several times to read the charts.
  • It’s a super simplification; I’m suspecting that it’s the tip of brand-new iceberg.
  • It’s largely common sense; we’ve all thought of this stuff before, but now it’s in tidy tables and supported by academics.

I hope this provides you with some new insights both personally and professionally; especially if you’re an educator or manager looking for new ways to approach your lazy or directionless students/employees … because helping them think about time a little differently could be the best thing you could do.

Talk To Your Students, Not At Them

Monday, June 15th, 2009

One of the best tips I received early on in my teaching career was to talk to my students as if they were adults, not at them as if they belonged to a different human sub-species. Here are some reasons why you should consider talking to your students instead of at them as well:

1. The most obvious reason: You talk to your friends, colleagues, and adult strangers. You don’t talk at them. Why would it be any different with your students? Are they members of a different human sub-species?

2. You reduce the chance of being viewed as a hypocrite. If how you talk to people depends on their station in life relative to your own (i.e. inferior, equal, superior), how can you ever hope to become an “integrated” person?  On the other hand, if you talk to everyone the same – whether they are friends, students, and/or colleagues – you increase your integrity (from “integrated”) and reduce the risk of being perceived as a hypocrite (from Greek hypokritēs which means actor).

3. When you talk to someone you’re indicating respect. When you talk at someone you’re broadcasting your own arrogance. Respectful people are liked. Arrogant people are not. In fact, I’m willing to bet most of those teachers who say, “My students just don’t respect me,” talk at their students.

4. You reduce the occupational hazards that come with teaching (e.g. bossyness, complusive social planning & ogranizing in social situations, not admitting to not knowing something, etc.). Put another way, when you talk to your friends, you don’t boss them around, you admit you don’t know things, and you don’t organize their lives for them. But when you talk at someone (even your friends), it’s easier to do all these things.

5. You’ll develop confidence as a leader amongst your friends and peers. When you talk at someone you view them as inferior, but when you talk to someone you view them as an equal. Teaching requires one to give orders, determine worth, enforce consequences, and manage people. Most people in life do not have to do such things. These are leadership tasks.  Teachers who view their students as equals learn how to do all these things in a fair, respectable, and positive way. Teachers who view their students as inferiors don’t. Teachers who talk to their students learn how to become positive and well-liked leaders.  Teachers who talk at their students don’t. It all starts with how you talk.

Conclusion ~ When you talk to your students, they’ll know that they’re working with “the real you.” As a result, they’ll respect you more, they’ll listen more when you do have to talk to them seriously, you will develop enviable leadership skills, and life will become easier because you’ll be able to be the real you.

TIP: Ask yourself on a regular basis, “Would I say it this way to a friend, to a colleague, or I’m standingbeside in a movie theater line-up?”  You’ll be amazed at the results … both in the classroom and in your personal life.

A Fair Way to Mark Group Work

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

After reading this article that claims students say, “No more group assignments—at least not until you figure out how to fairly grade each student’s individual contributions,” I thought I would share my process for grading group work. It’s fair, it’s been hugely successful, and it’s the most accurate way I’ve been able to determine who did what work on a group project. Most students love it, only a few have disliked it (usually the social loafers), and – in my opinion – it’s an important skill-building exercise. Here it is, for what it’s worth …

1. Group Mark: This is the usual group mark; the mark earned on a project, paper, presentation, etc.   For example, let’s say a group of 4 members earned 16/20 on their presentation project. Their group mark is 16. Most often educators stop here, but I don’t think it tells enough of the story. So …

2. Total Group Points: Then they determined this by multiplying the group mark by the number of members in the group. Continuing with the example, the group mark of 16 is multiplied by the 4 group members giving us 64 Total Group Pts (4 x 16 = 64).

3. Prepare Fractions: Then on a piece of paper, I have the students write a fraction beside every group member’s name, leaving the numerator blank and using the same denominator as the group mark. For example:

  • Stan =    /20
  • Susan =   /20
  • Joe =     /20
  • Tanya =    /20
  • Total Group Pts = 80

4. Group Negotiates Individual Marks: Then the group works out – on their own – who should get how many of the total group points. I ask them to review what went well and what didn’t, and have them use that information – on their own – to decide how to allocate their total group points. They cannot use more or less than the total number of group points they earned, some members may earn up to 105%, and it’s up to them to present their cases to their group mates as to why each member should get what they should get.

For example, lets say Stan was ‘the man’ and the group agrees their decent mark of 16/20 was largely due to him doing a great job on the most difficult tasks. They agree he should receive 105%, which would look like this:

  • Stan = 21/20
  • Susan =    /20
  • Joe =    /20
  • Tanya =     /20
  • Total Group Pts Left = 43 (64 – 21 = 43)

Then they move on to Joe, who – the groups agrees – did absolutely nothing in preparing for the presentation (Stan did Joe’s work), but a good job in the actual presentation.  The group decides to give Joe 8/20, and we’re left with this:

  • Stan = 21/20
  • Susan =   /20
  • Joe =  8/20
  • Tanya =    /20
  • Total Group Pts Left = 35 (43 – 8 = 35)

Finally, Susan says that she and Tanya contributed equally (which is mostly true), but Tanya adds that she was the one who spent a good 30 minutes proofreading everyone’s final work and fixing mistakes. With this, the group decides on the following marks and submits them to their instructor who records them as the individual grades for the group assignment:

  • Stan =  21/20
  • Susan = 16.5/20
  • Joe =  8/20
  • Tanya = 18.5/20
  • Totals = 64/80

5. Teacher Records the Marks: The teacher, then, does the following things before recording the marks:

  • Verifies the numbers add up, ensuring students aren’t trying to add a couple marks here and there (it happens more often than you think, and it always results in group members blaming bad math skills .. he he),
  • Ensures that the group generally agrees with the collective decision/allotment, making sure no one was bullied, intimidated or guilted into taking a lower grade than they felt they rightfully deserved.
  • Fields questions and assists with any negotiations that become heated, sometimes teaching (or coaching) a group how deliberate on the issue and how to present and listen to points-made calmly and rationally.