If Technology is Not Adding Value, It’s a Gimmick

March 11th, 2009

I recently stumbled upon Mr. Thielmann’s blog this morning – a high school social studies teacher in Prince George, BC – and wanted to reply to the great questions he asked in his “Digital Story Telling” post. In it he asks:

“How is technology helping or hurting in the demonstration of learning? How can we build on this?”

My answer is simple: If it’s not adding value, it’s a gimmick.

We’re one of the few animals on earth who can readily create tools and devices to help us meet our needs. Sure chimps can use twigs to get into ant hills (and even use spears), sure ravens perform all sorts of intelligent tricks to get what they want, and on an on … But we are the only animal that can manipulate our environment – at will – to help us satisfy our needs. And that’s the true value of technology, in my opinion.

So with reference to Thielmann’s question about technology hurting or helping learning, I think we educators need to be thinking asking this question:

“Is this technology adding educational value, or is it just a gimmick?”

If our desired outcome is quality learning – like really meaningful learning – then we need to be looking for technologies that make this happen better and easier. And the worst thing we can do is waste our students’ time in learning new technologies without having educational goals in the first place. If that’s what we’re doing, then technology is a gimmick. We’re not adding value. We’re hurting learning.

Let me explain by sharing one of my own experiences.

How I Hurt Learning with Technology ~

A couple years ago I heard about blogs. “Cool,” I thought, “I’m gonna use these next week.” The day came and I spent 30 minutes of time walking students down to the computer lab, booting up computers, and guiding everyone through the process of creating Blogger accounts. Then – after 30 minutes of set-up time – I asked them to respond to a question on their blogs. Why did this hurt learning? Because – at that time and for that group of students – I had NO intention of treating the blog responses any differently than paper/pen paragraph responses. My intention was this: They write it. I check it. I record mark. Done.

Pen/paper technology would have sufficed for this one-time writing assignment, and I would’ve saved 30 minutes of class time. Instead, because I wasn’t ready to commit to regular blog use, I could have better used the 30 minutes for silent pen/paper writing in class. Then we could have used the remaining time for meaningful, face-to-face discussions about everyone’s responses to the prompt … really fleshing out our ideas and learning from one another.

How Technology Could have Helped Learning ~

I’m not saying blogs are bad. I’m saying that when we use technology it MUST be used to add value to our learning goals. It has to fit.  It has to add value.

So what should I have done if I wanted to help my students’ learning with blogs? Easy.

  1. First commit myself to using them frequently with that group of students, making the 30 minutes of set-up time an investment rather than a waste of time,
  2. Incorporate the blogging comments feature into that assignment by shortening the length of my students’ initial response and replacing it with a component that asked them to compose 2-4 meaningful comments on their classmates’ posts,
  3. Lead by example by commenting myself, showing my students that I care enough about what they’re writing to do it myself,
  4. Display and discuss what was posted online with my students the next class. This is the most important because it validates the whole process and takes advantage of the fact that everyone’s comments can be viewed online, in an instant.

In sum, we can’t expect technology to improve learning if we just use it. It must add value. This means we need to re-think the form and function of our technology-related activities and assignments because, at the end of the day, if it’s not making learning better and easier, then it’s not technology. It’s a distraction.

Practicing Innovative Instruction

March 10th, 2009

I read another educator’s great blog post about failure and risk taking in the teaching and learning process. You should read it, it was great. But one sentence in the post really caught my attention, and that was this sentence:

I, for one, am tired of reading about innovative instruction and not practicing it. It seems that many of these philosophies of curriculum and instruction exist only on paper written by academics who publish in journals that often go unread by the classroom instructors.

The best use of learning – in my opinion – is putting what’s learned into constructive action. This makes it real. It makes it tangible. It makes it meaningful. And this includes the learning about teaching and learning.

If all of us educators did what the quote above suggests on a regular basis – if we tried out just half of the new teaching ideas and practices we stumbled upon because we looked forward to learning from what didn’t work as much as from what did work – not only would we be modeling the best kind of learning to our students, but I think we would become much better teachers … much more quickly.

Taking a Stand

March 8th, 2009

Psychology tells us that we’re pretty good at sizing things up in the first few seconds. I’m sharing this because it has serious implications for school teachers.

We can learn a lot about someone in just 30 seconds; even more in 5 minutes; and after an hour we pretty much know how to act/react around someone. We know what things to say and not say, what things to do and not do.

One of the most difficult things about being a school teacher is learning how to stand up for yourself and the rules you believe in. In the social world we don’t “administer” consequences to our friends when they arrive late, forget to bring something, talk out of turn, or say something off-base. We might get mad at them, we might say something to them, we might stop being friends with them, but we don’t administer the kinds of consequences teachers have to administer when someone in their class breaks the rules. It’s entirely different.

When rules come before feelings and relationships – like in teaching – how we interact with people changes. And this requires us to change. And this change is one of the toughest lessons teachers have to learn. But it is vitally important.

If you start off as their best friend, they’ll treat you like a peer. They’ll love you at first and then laugh at you when you try to get serious … when you try to “pull rank.”

If you start off like a bully, they won’t like you … but they’ll never tell you they don’t like you, because they fear you … and then your students won’t learn anything.

If you start off timid, they’ll jump all over you. You might be able to regain control, but it will be difficult, and you’ll never get a second chance at making that first impression … which will linger despite your recovery.

Not Taking a Stand

Not Taking a Stand

If you never take a stand, they won’t know where you stand. They’ll likely walk all over you and what you believe in because … by not taking a stand … you let them.

But if you take a stand, right at the beginning, articulating your rules, your boundaries, and your expectations, which have to include, either implicitly or explicitly, that above all else everyone is to be respected and listened to – a rule all of us want and know is right – and you show them that you’re not afraid to administer consequences to those who violate the rules … When you show them this, when you take this stand in the first 30 seconds, 5 minutes, and hour of your time with them, they will know where they stand in relation to you.

And they’ll like it. They’ll respect you more for it. For setting boundaries. For letting them know where they stand in relation to you.

When respect is present, it holds steady because people gravitate towards it. They know it’s right.

But be careful: Disrespect can spread like wild fire. And if you don’t take a stand … well … you’re letting the winds of chance dictate what becomes of your classroom learning environment.

So take a stand.

Weather Vanes

March 3rd, 2009

A third will work hard and learn lots no matter what. They’re your clydesdale learners.

A third will naturally resist … not no matter what … but they’ll resist and resist and resist before they commit to learning.

And a third will sit on the fence … like weather vanes … waiting for a fair or foul breeze to point them in any direction.

If you’re looking for the best group of learners to target  … to really make a difference … focus on the weather vanes.

If you have two-thirds of the group excited and buying in, the resistors will be that much easier to convert when they know they’re in the minority.

weather vane

Respect First, Learn Second

March 2nd, 2009

Hey educators, guess what. What you teach in your classroom won’t matter if there’s no respect.

Let me explain with a story.

If I had to describe my 9th grade math class in a word, it would be ‘scary.’  Every class I was afraid. For starters I was afraid of my teacher. He looked scary, he talked scary, and he often made fun of students who couldn’t produce the correct answer. I’m sure he thought he was being funny.  But I was 14 and he scared the heck out of me. I also dreaded the humiliations and punishments that 4 or 5 students in that class inflicted on the rest of us. Getting drilled in the arm when our teacher wasn’t looking. Pen jabs in the back of the head. Kicks in the shin. Desk weggies. Being called names that I probably shouldn’t repeat here. You know, typical 9th Grade stuff.  And these kids never got in trouble. They weren’t bad kids. If anything, it was developmentally appropriate. But they knew they could get away with it. So they did it. And I dreaded it. When I looked at my Math 9 textbook at home, I only thought about the next class … with fear!

And how much did I learn in that class? Like how much did I really learn?  Zilch.  Nada.  Nothing.

Sure hormones got in the way. Sure a class full of imaginary audiences got in the way. And sure I wasn’t the best at math to begin with. But it’s true, I learned next to nothing in 9th grade math.  But that experience made me a better educator. Why?  Simple:

Respect first, learn second.

Let me explain.  When we perceive a threat, our brains get hijacked by our fight or flight response. Our brains – specifically our amygdala’s – pump adrenaline and other hormones throughout our bodies. We sense the threat, and our brains optimize our bodies for a fight or a flight. Now this is important to understand because the ‘human’ parts of the brain – the parts of our brains that allow us to do human-like things (like learning in schools), are way up in the cloudy-looking part of the brain called the cortex. In fact, there’s a general rule that the closer a part of the brain is to the spinal cord, the more primitive its function is. Breathing, for example, is taken care of by the brain stem (right above the spinal cord). And you can see that the amygdala – our fight or flight center – is way down low with the rest of the primitive brain stuff (for more, click here).

The amygdala is where fear happens ... way down by the brain stem

The amygdala is where fear happens ... way down by the primitive brain stem.

For educators, this is important, especially the word “perceived.” In my 9th grade math class, I was never going to die. My teacher wasn’t going to kill me. I knew my classmates would never beat me to a pulp. But each and every day I was afraid nonetheless. I perceived a threat, and my amygdala got me ready to fight back or run away. My cortex was hijacked. I couldn’t learn a thing.

Had my teacher made us feel comfortable, had my teacher insisted that everyone in the room treat one another with respect, had my teacher punished those who were being disrespectful, none of us would have been as afraid as we were. We would have felt safe (or safer), and we may have been a little more able to learn.

Educators must demand respect in their classrooms. They must be willing to come down hard on students who are being disresptful. And they must – more than anything – be respectful themselves. We can all think back on one or two teachers who we learned so much from. Not necessarily the ones who we liked the most, but the ones we learned lots and lots from. And I’m willing to bet that somewhere near the top of that teacher’s rulebook was a “Be Respectful” rule. It may have been explicit. It may have been implicit. But if you learned lots, I’m betting that you felt safe. You felt respected. You felt dignified. Your cortex was operational. And you learned … a lot.