I recently stumbled upon Mr. Thielmann’s blog this morning – a high school social studies teacher in Prince George, BC – and wanted to reply to the great questions he asked in his “Digital Story Telling” post. In it he asks:
“How is technology helping or hurting in the demonstration of learning? How can we build on this?”
My answer is simple: If it’s not adding value, it’s a gimmick.
We’re one of the few animals on earth who can readily create tools and devices to help us meet our needs. Sure chimps can use twigs to get into ant hills (and even use spears), sure ravens perform all sorts of intelligent tricks to get what they want, and on an on … But we are the only animal that can manipulate our environment – at will – to help us satisfy our needs. And that’s the true value of technology, in my opinion.
So with reference to Thielmann’s question about technology hurting or helping learning, I think we educators need to be thinking asking this question:
“Is this technology adding educational value, or is it just a gimmick?”
If our desired outcome is quality learning – like really meaningful learning – then we need to be looking for technologies that make this happen better and easier. And the worst thing we can do is waste our students’ time in learning new technologies without having educational goals in the first place. If that’s what we’re doing, then technology is a gimmick. We’re not adding value. We’re hurting learning.
Let me explain by sharing one of my own experiences.
How I Hurt Learning with Technology ~
A couple years ago I heard about blogs. “Cool,” I thought, “I’m gonna use these next week.” The day came and I spent 30 minutes of time walking students down to the computer lab, booting up computers, and guiding everyone through the process of creating Blogger accounts. Then – after 30 minutes of set-up time – I asked them to respond to a question on their blogs. Why did this hurt learning? Because – at that time and for that group of students – I had NO intention of treating the blog responses any differently than paper/pen paragraph responses. My intention was this: They write it. I check it. I record mark. Done.
Pen/paper technology would have sufficed for this one-time writing assignment, and I would’ve saved 30 minutes of class time. Instead, because I wasn’t ready to commit to regular blog use, I could have better used the 30 minutes for silent pen/paper writing in class. Then we could have used the remaining time for meaningful, face-to-face discussions about everyone’s responses to the prompt … really fleshing out our ideas and learning from one another.
How Technology Could have Helped Learning ~
I’m not saying blogs are bad. I’m saying that when we use technology it MUST be used to add value to our learning goals. It has to fit. It has to add value.
So what should I have done if I wanted to help my students’ learning with blogs? Easy.
- First commit myself to using them frequently with that group of students, making the 30 minutes of set-up time an investment rather than a waste of time,
- Incorporate the blogging comments feature into that assignment by shortening the length of my students’ initial response and replacing it with a component that asked them to compose 2-4 meaningful comments on their classmates’ posts,
- Lead by example by commenting myself, showing my students that I care enough about what they’re writing to do it myself,
- Display and discuss what was posted online with my students the next class. This is the most important because it validates the whole process and takes advantage of the fact that everyone’s comments can be viewed online, in an instant.
In sum, we can’t expect technology to improve learning if we just use it. It must add value. This means we need to re-think the form and function of our technology-related activities and assignments because, at the end of the day, if it’s not making learning better and easier, then it’s not technology. It’s a distraction.