Archive for the ‘Teaching Ideas’ Category

Weather Vanes

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

A third will work hard and learn lots no matter what. They’re your clydesdale learners.

A third will naturally resist … not no matter what … but they’ll resist and resist and resist before they commit to learning.

And a third will sit on the fence … like weather vanes … waiting for a fair or foul breeze to point them in any direction.

If you’re looking for the best group of learners to target  … to really make a difference … focus on the weather vanes.

If you have two-thirds of the group excited and buying in, the resistors will be that much easier to convert when they know they’re in the minority.

weather vane

Great Ideas for Politial Science Courses

Monday, February 9th, 2009

This weekend I attended the Teaching and Learning Conference in Baltimore, MD (put on by the American Political Science Association). Although I was there exhibiting The Civic Mirror, I also had the extreme priviledge of sitting in on the “Simulations and Role Plays” track which consisted of a group of 20+ political scientists who discussed that very topic – as it pertains to the teaching and learning of political science – all weekend long. Here were some of the outstanding thoughts and ideas coming out of the track:

How Much Should the Educator Guide the Simulated Experience?
Professor William Cunion, from Mount Union College, opened the track by posing the question every experiential educator faces: “How much should I guide and focus the student-led learning experience?” In his paper he discusses this dilema where, on the one hand, 1) Focusing student attention on targeted learning objectives runs the risk of preventing other, unexpected kinds of learning from occuring, but, on the other hand, 2) Not focusing attention on intended learning objectives runs the risk of having fewer students obtain the targeted learning objectives.  A great question, and one I think every experiential educator needs to keep in mind  [To read Dr. Cunion’s paper, which explains what I’m trying to summarize 100-times better, click this link, then click the “browse” button on the left, then select the “Simulations” track, and then go to page 2].

Civil War Simulation
Professor Rex Brynen, from McGill University, created and runs a peace-keeping simulation called Brynania in his political science course every year. Talk about making education meaningful! This simulation generates over 10,000 emails in a week; his100 seat peace-keeping course fills up within 7 minutes after online course registration opens (at midnight, no less), and for the week that the simulation runs, his students spend – on average – 12 hours a day working on it. McGill anyone?

EuroSim
Asst. Professor Rebecca Jones, from Widener University, runs EuroSim with her students every year, a simulation of the governing process of the European Union. What was equally interesting was her recently published paper (in the Journal of Political Science Education) which discusses and references research that validates how experiential learning activities (like simulations) can dramatically improve student learning in the following ways:

  • motivation and interest,
  • cognitive knowledge,
  • affective learning (e.g. empathy),
  • student interaction patterns, and
  • world view.

Fantasy Congress
Professor Jennifer Hora, from Valparaiso University, discussed a Fantasy Congress simulation that she ran in her 300-level Congress course. The idea is that students research and draft U.S. Congresspersons in hopes that they will score lots of points by drafting and passing legistlation, participating in committee reports, etc. in the real and live U.S. Congress. It’s like fantasy sports … but the sport is the legislation and the athletes are politicians. Just listening to Jennifer talk about her students’ excitement and enthusiasm about congressional current events was enough to sell me. What a great example of making education meaningful for students!

What’s to Learn if Everything’s Searchable within Seconds?

Sunday, February 8th, 2009

What if we had headsets, or implants, that allowed us to access anything off the internet in less than a second of desiring that information? What use would a teacher be? What would we need schools for?

Last summer (and for the life of me I can’t find the link) I was reading a Fast Company or Fortune magazine article that interviewed Lary Page, one of the Google founders. Page was talking about his (and Google’s) 20-40 year vision of creating search implants that would interact with our minds to help us access whatever information we wanted within minutes (related links here, here, and here).

Granted I don’t think any of us will be around to read the brain implant headlines (if anyone will be); however, this idea does illustrate just how immediately accessible information will be in the coming years?

And yes, information already is instantly available … but the effort we will need to expend to find what we need will decrease and decrease.

So what implications does this have on how we should design our learning environments? What changes are we noticing already?

Think of all the students who don’t get why they have to memorize maps and plot directions when they can just do instant, online map searches.

Think of the stories you’ve read about professors scrambling for a missing fact in lectures and their students finding it quicker than they could with their smart phones.

Think of spreadsheets and calculators and statistical software programs that pump out desired calculations in seconds.

In sum, technology (i.e. the internet) will continue to replace many of the mental steps we need to do to complete a complex task, but it won’t, in my opinion, replace the high level thinking that’s needed to guide learning and discovery needed to complete it. Technology won’t replace what’s needed to make valuable connections between here and there, between what we have and what need to discover, and between what’s important and what’s unimportant.

That “what’s needed” is wisdom and insight.

And this is where the educator will become more and more important as we venture deeper and deeper into the Information Age. If everything’s searchable within seconds, quality educators will be needed to help us answer questions like these:

How do we make sense of all this data?

What can you really do with this map technology?

Why do we need to use that math formula? What will it allow us to do?

What should we be searching for? How do we know if it’s quality?

More than ever, the real value of educators will be in their ability to stay ahead of the curve and pass on their insights with their students. For some time we’ve been told that “Life-Long Learners” will be the ones who will succeed in the Information Age … and now we’re starting to see living proof of this. The best educators, then, will be the best examples of life-long learning – they will be the ones who will have the most to share, the most insights gained, and the most acquired wisdom.

Technology won’t replace educators or lessen their importance. Instead, technology will demand that they constantly learn, really teach … and disseminate less.

Where Are You Going In Life?

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

I start my courses by asking my students the title question. Even when I teach literature or government and economics and history and entrepreneurship … I place huge emphasis on this question. And if I taught math or gym or wood work or basket weaving, I would still place huge emphasis on this question.

Why?

Because my course is about my students, not me.  We all teach because there are people – and often very young and inexperienced little people who have their whole lives ahead of them – who need to learn things from us. Teaching is about our students.

Teaching is not about us.

Teaching is not about our love for our subjects.

Teaching is not about passing or failing or percentages and letter grades.

Real teaching – and I mean the best kind of teaching – is about inspiring our students to become more than they are. To motivate our students to challenge themselves and push themselves harder. To actualize their hidden potential.

But this is the problem. Why would anyone work hard and challenge themselves if they had no sense of where they were headed? They wouldn’t. There would be nothing to work towards.

And this is what I realized in my eighth year of teaching: My course did not matter unless it mattered to my students! “If I cannot make this course meaningful for my students,” I asked myself, “Am I fulfilling my duties as their educator? What does it say about me as a teacher if I cannot help my students understand how this course might relate to their own lives and ambitions?” I really believe that when educators ask themselves questions like these ones, the results can be remarkable. It puts our reason for being into perspective. It makes things clearer. It gives us courage to do things differently. It helps us focus our energies. It helps us make our students’ educational experience with us more meaningful.

*           *            *

COURSE INTRODUCTION + WHERE ARE YOU GOING IN LIFE?

So here’s how I introduce my courses while trying to simultaneously answer these questions. It’s an oversimplification and I’m certain that it’s not the best answer, but I thought it would be fitting to share what I do on this first day of 2009 … a day when many of us are asking what we want out of this new year.

1. Introduce myself, my course, grading weights, yada yada yada. Side Notes: Do any of us really take the first day of classes seriously? What’s really the point of the typical introduction?  It’s kind of like a bunch of wolves sniffing one another, marking territory, and getting an intuitive sense of who’s who and what’s to come. I challenge every educator to make their course introduction more meaningful than the typical one. Think about whether or not your course intro is any different than a bunch of pack animals sniffing one another and marking territory.

2. Draw a 100 year line across the board. I would always start the 100 year line so that the date of birth of the oldest looking student would be showing (e.g. 1989), and then indicate where every ten years would be on the line. E.g. 1991—-2001—-2011– … –2091. I would make my students create their own version of this line too. I would mark an “x” on the current year (e.g. 2009) and say, “We are here.” And then I would ask my students, “Where on this line would you like to die?” Some would ask, “Uh, what does this have to do with civics, or economics, or entrepreneurship?” And I would reply, “It has everything to do with you being in this civics, economics, or entrepreneurship course,” because it does. Understanding and feeling the finiteness of our lives helps instill a sense of urgency. And urgency helps motivate us to do a bit more than we would otherwise.

3. Students mark their ages and life-predictions on the ten-year intervals. Then I would ask my students to indicate how old they would be on each of the ten year intervals. E.g. 0 yrs in 1991, 10 yrs. in 2001, etc. Then, I would ask them – if they could imagine their dream life – to write what kind of day they would be waking up to in each of the ten year intervals, in two sentences or less. Who would they be? What would they be doing? Who would be in their lives? Why? Etc. Then, after a few minutes I would interrupt them and move to step 4.

4. Ask them, “How can this course help you achieve your dreams?” This step is the whole point of the exercise. I wanted my students to start thinking about where they wanted to go and who they wanted to become. I wanted them to want something really, really bad. I wanted them to get excited about that dream life of theirs … excited enough that they might even be willing to consider working hard for it. And I wanted them to realize that their experience in my course was part of that journey. And I would tell them that this course would likely not be a big part of their path forward, but a part nonetheless. I wanted them to understand where it fit into their own grand scheme of things.

5. First Homework Assignment. And after making points like this and many others, I would make steps 3 and 4 their first homework assignment. They would have the rest of the class to think about what their dream life would look like in 10 year snapshots. They would have the rest of the class to review my course outline to see how the content might relate to their future path and future needs. And this whole process, assuming they took it seriously (which most did), was an exercise in making my course more meaningful for them! It was about them constructing their own purpose and defining what they wanted out of my course.

And it worked!