Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category

Introducing the “Sanity Savers” Series for the Upcoming Teaching Year

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

Last year I talked with lots of educators across North America and one thing kept coming up: the year was abnormally busy and people were stressed out. Educators were saying the same thing everywhere: teaching is really, really stressful.

We all know that teachers are overworked, under-resourced, and on stage all the time. Just trying to ‘cover’ all of our prescribed curriculum while making it palatable for our students – let alone exciting – is ulcer-inducing on its own.

Heck, being in a room with 20+ children or teenagers 5 days a week can be enough to send someone over the edge.

Then there’s the fact that we teachers often have to work with a clientele that doesn’t want to work with us, or with helicopter parents who have no problems telling you how you should be teaching and grading their son or daughter differently.  Oh, I almost forgot the marking, calls home, attendance and late slips, coaching, and after-school time for extra-help and make-up assignments.

I’m getting stressed just writing this.

Enter the Sanity Savers …

So, to help make this coming teaching year a better one, I’d like to share with you 5 Sanity Savers that have helped me make teaching more fun, less stressful, and even less work over the past 12 years. These aren’t your usual ‘teaching tips‘ that you’ll find on any old website. I’ve gone to great lengths to ensure that each one is high-quality, easy to execute, stress-reducing, and exciting!

I’ll be posting one “Sanity Saver” every Thursday morning for the next 5 weeks, starting this week. This will give you a week’s time to think about and practice each one, making it more meaningful.

Have the next posts emailed to you, or
Add them to your iGoogle Homepage
.

On Wisdom and Creativity

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Last week, at the first-ever Civic Mirror Summer Institute in Edmonds, WA, I spoke to the group several times about how truly crazy it is that I’ve spent the last 8 years developing The Civic Mirror and now Action-Ed. I mean, when all of the emphasis in education over the last ten years has been on assessment methods and curricular standardization, I’ve totally done the opposite and invested everything into an experiential, growth-oriented, game-based educational initiative.

But (I continued to explain) there was always something deep down that told me it was the right thing to do. It was real teaching. It brought out the inner-life in my otherwise sedated students. It got them out of their seats and talking about life and the world and how they want it to be.  It was the reason I put “wisdom” at the center of Action-Ed’s philosophy.

And so I want to share an inspiring passage from the best book I’ve read in a long time. It’s taken from Brenda Ueland’s If You Want to Write (page 144). It reminds me of why I got into the business of teaching in the first place, and what “real teaching” and “real learning” truly is. I hope you find it a pleasant contrast to all the standards and benchmarks and assessment methods we’re all worrying about right before this new school year begins:

“Or should I put it this way: van Gogh and Chekhov and all great people have known inwardly that they were something. They have had a passionate conviction of their importance, of the life, the fire, the god in them. But they were never sure that others would necessarily see it in them, or that recognition would ever come.

But this is the point: everybody in the world has the same conviction of inner importance, fire, of the god within. The tragedy is that either they stifle their fire by not believing in it and using it; or they try to prove to the world and themselves that they have it, not inwardly and greatly, but externally and egotistically, by some second-rate thing like money or power or more publicity.

Therefore all should work. First because it is impossible that you have no creative gift. Second: the only way to make it live and increase is to use it. Third: you cannot be sure that it is not a great gift.”

Dealing with Cell Phones and iPods in the Classroom

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

I allow cell phones and iPods in class. It’s never been an issue for me because I don’t make it about trust or control. That’s why the school from the image below and this micromanaging principal have both had so many problems. Instead I make it an issue of respect and personal productivity. I became an educator to teach, foster growth, and have fun. Not to police.

School Problems with Bad Cell Phone Policy

School Problems with Bad Cell Phone Policy

So here’s how I deal with cell phones and iPods. It’s fun, it embraces 21st century technology, it teaches students to be respectful, and it teaches them how to manage their time and attention productively.

Rule #1. Absolutely no one can use phones or iPods when someone has the floor.

This means whenever a classmate is speaking, I’m speaking, or something else comes up that is “floor worthy” – which means that it deserves undivided attention and respect – cell phones and iPods are off limits.

I explain that this isn’t just a school thing; it’s real world etiquette (often I have to explain what etiquette means too).  You wouldn’t show up to a business meeting with head-phones in your ears. You wouldn’t dare stop your foreman from explaining his instructions in order to reply to a text. And you’d be ticked off if someone ignored something important you were saying to check their phone or iPod. It’s about respect.

Rule #2. You can use phones or iPods when it’s individual work time.

I like the message of autonomy that this sends out to my students; however, I include this caveat:

“Listen, when it comes to work and school you can be doing one of two things: getting ahead or getting behind. So think about that when you scroll through your music to build the best playlist ever, or text your friend about whatever so and so said.”

Then, when I see them really wasting time in class with their iPod or cell phone, I’ll just shout out and say, “Hey, Julie, are you getting ahead or getting behind?”

And the answer is almost always a mumbling, “Behind.”

And I reply with, “And what do you think you should really be doing?

“Getting ahead.”

“Then you know what to do.” And nine times out of ten they put their phone/iPod down and get back to work.

I like this because it makes the issue positive and keeps it in their control. It’s fun, constructively embarrassing for some, and a good, experiential way to remind them that they’re not being productive.  I remind them that they – and only they – are in control of themselves. They can do whatever they want, but a lot of what they do is counter-productive to their own goals and desires and dreams.

Rule #3: If you violate rule #1, the class stops to support your addiction.

Because, at the end of the day, that’s what it is: an addiction. Sneaking a peak (at the phone/music-player) instead of respectfully paying attention can be explained really well as a compulsion – a bad habit that hijacks the person.  I explain this way of looking at cell phones and iPods to my students in advance. I explain that a great way of overcoming addictions is with a support group. And, with a big knowing smile on my face, I explain what happens when someone violates Rule #1 (i.e. uses their phone/iPod when someone has the floor). Here’s the procedure:

  1. Whatever was happening in class stops.
  2. The violator comes to the front of the class with his or her phone/iPod.
  3. The violator faces the class, holding his or her phone/iPod in the air, and repeats the following sentences after me:
  4. “Hello, my name is Johnny (for example).”
  5. I get the class to say, “Hi Johnny.”
  6. Violator says, “I’m up here because I have a cell phone and/or iPod addiction.”
  7. Class says, “We’re here for you Johnny.”
  8. I usually say (again, in good spirit), “It’s OK Johnny, there’s lots of addicts out there. Don’t feel like you’re all alone.”
  9. Then the “addict” leaves his or her phone/iPod either on my front table or back desk (wherever I can keep an eye on it in case of theft).

And sometimes, if the student is a good sport and I catch them gazing at their phone/iPod afterwards, I’ll tease them a bit with something like,

“It’s tough isn’t it? Has this been the longest you’ve gone without it for a while? Remember, we’re here for you.”

This gets the class laughing but also reminds the other ‘would-be-addicts’ to think twice before whipping their phones/iPods out when they shouldn’t.

Again, this method is fun, it embraces 21st century technology, it teaches students to be respectful, and it teaches them how to manage their time and attention productively … something so important in this information age with its endless distractions.

Please feel free to leave comments and/or ask questions!

Talk To Your Students, Not At Them

Monday, June 15th, 2009

One of the best tips I received early on in my teaching career was to talk to my students as if they were adults, not at them as if they belonged to a different human sub-species. Here are some reasons why you should consider talking to your students instead of at them as well:

1. The most obvious reason: You talk to your friends, colleagues, and adult strangers. You don’t talk at them. Why would it be any different with your students? Are they members of a different human sub-species?

2. You reduce the chance of being viewed as a hypocrite. If how you talk to people depends on their station in life relative to your own (i.e. inferior, equal, superior), how can you ever hope to become an “integrated” person?  On the other hand, if you talk to everyone the same – whether they are friends, students, and/or colleagues – you increase your integrity (from “integrated”) and reduce the risk of being perceived as a hypocrite (from Greek hypokritēs which means actor).

3. When you talk to someone you’re indicating respect. When you talk at someone you’re broadcasting your own arrogance. Respectful people are liked. Arrogant people are not. In fact, I’m willing to bet most of those teachers who say, “My students just don’t respect me,” talk at their students.

4. You reduce the occupational hazards that come with teaching (e.g. bossyness, complusive social planning & ogranizing in social situations, not admitting to not knowing something, etc.). Put another way, when you talk to your friends, you don’t boss them around, you admit you don’t know things, and you don’t organize their lives for them. But when you talk at someone (even your friends), it’s easier to do all these things.

5. You’ll develop confidence as a leader amongst your friends and peers. When you talk at someone you view them as inferior, but when you talk to someone you view them as an equal. Teaching requires one to give orders, determine worth, enforce consequences, and manage people. Most people in life do not have to do such things. These are leadership tasks.  Teachers who view their students as equals learn how to do all these things in a fair, respectable, and positive way. Teachers who view their students as inferiors don’t. Teachers who talk to their students learn how to become positive and well-liked leaders.  Teachers who talk at their students don’t. It all starts with how you talk.

Conclusion ~ When you talk to your students, they’ll know that they’re working with “the real you.” As a result, they’ll respect you more, they’ll listen more when you do have to talk to them seriously, you will develop enviable leadership skills, and life will become easier because you’ll be able to be the real you.

TIP: Ask yourself on a regular basis, “Would I say it this way to a friend, to a colleague, or I’m standingbeside in a movie theater line-up?”  You’ll be amazed at the results … both in the classroom and in your personal life.

We’re All Big Kids

Monday, May 25th, 2009

A few times this year my wonderful wife has sent me to work to help with our “VISA repayment plan” (it’s the least I can do considering she’s pregnant and working full time). So I’ve embarked on a few stints of substitute teaching. It’s been, surprisingly, amazingly educational.

Last week I found myself in a gymnasium with two classes of Gr.4 boys, organizing and refereeing “The Super Hockey Championships” between team green-hockey-sticks and team orange-hockey-sticks. We had a mini-training camp where we did stutter steps until there were two kids standing, lines with push-ups and sit-ups intermixed, and running races. It was serious business. And if it was something other than “The Super Hockey Championship” right afterward, they would’ve been too bagged to play. But it wasn’t, and the training-camp made the game all the more important.

I noticed one of the little boys right at the start of the class. He was very athletic and a couple of times I caught him whispering things to his teammates. What he said couldn’t have been nice considering how deflated the recipients of the messages looked once the whispering ended … and the scowl on the whispering boys face confirmed my suspicion. I thought to myself, “I better keep an eye on this one.”

Each team had an A-shift and a B-shift. They were to take turns playing every three minutes. Four minutes into the game and one minute into B-shifts first shift, I noticed that a frumpy and clumsy looking boy hadn’t played yet. I walked over and asked him if he wanted to play. He nodded fiercely. I asked why he wasn’t playing and he looked up at the whispering/scowling boy. “Hmmm … ” I thought.  I gave whispering/scowling boy a penalty and insisted that frumpy/clumsy boy play during the penalty plus another shift to make up for his lost time.

Ten minutes later I announced, “4 minutes left!” At the same time I caught the same team trying to keep frumpy/clumsy boy on the bench … but this time it was another boy. This meant that new-penalty-boy would sit on the bench, and someone else from that team would have to come off so frumpy/clumsy boy could play. I chose whispering/scowling boy. He slammed his stick on the gym floor.

It was a close end to the game. The team taking all the penalties was trying to protect their one goal lead, and swarms of orange and green hockey sticks clashed and banged in that tiny little gymnasium. For these Gr.4 kids it meant everything. It was epic. And out of the corner of my eye I saw whispering/scowling boy wipe a tear from his eye. I realized he had only played about 4 minutes of the 20 minute game. I recalled how hard he worked in training camp. I thought how badly he wanted to win. How excluded he likely felt. How unfair it was that this strange man was making him miss the most important game of Gr.4 hockey. His tears were so real that I felt silly and ashamed.

And then I thought how we’re all this way. We’re all big kids. Some of us scowl and whisper, some of us klutz around, and most of us do other sorts of things. But at the end of the day, we all just want to be included. We just want to be part of the action. To be liked. To be acknowledged and validated by our peers and the people we look up to. But we forget these things as we get older because we get so good at hiding our feelings, forgetting that all of our own feelings – and other people’s too – come from the same place regardless of our age.

So I let the whispering/scowling boy with the face full of tears start playing before his team penalty “officially” ended with a nod and a smile. And I don’t know if it was the fact that he could play, or the knowing, warm look I gave him, but you should have seen his eyes light up. And maybe that was all the little tyke needed in the first place … just a bit of acknowledgment and validation.

And maybe that’s what all of us are looking for … the same things kids are: fair rules, solid boundaries, high-expectations, and a little bit of encouragement and validation along the way.