Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category

Taking a Stand

Sunday, March 8th, 2009

Psychology tells us that we’re pretty good at sizing things up in the first few seconds. I’m sharing this because it has serious implications for school teachers.

We can learn a lot about someone in just 30 seconds; even more in 5 minutes; and after an hour we pretty much know how to act/react around someone. We know what things to say and not say, what things to do and not do.

One of the most difficult things about being a school teacher is learning how to stand up for yourself and the rules you believe in. In the social world we don’t “administer” consequences to our friends when they arrive late, forget to bring something, talk out of turn, or say something off-base. We might get mad at them, we might say something to them, we might stop being friends with them, but we don’t administer the kinds of consequences teachers have to administer when someone in their class breaks the rules. It’s entirely different.

When rules come before feelings and relationships – like in teaching – how we interact with people changes. And this requires us to change. And this change is one of the toughest lessons teachers have to learn. But it is vitally important.

If you start off as their best friend, they’ll treat you like a peer. They’ll love you at first and then laugh at you when you try to get serious … when you try to “pull rank.”

If you start off like a bully, they won’t like you … but they’ll never tell you they don’t like you, because they fear you … and then your students won’t learn anything.

If you start off timid, they’ll jump all over you. You might be able to regain control, but it will be difficult, and you’ll never get a second chance at making that first impression … which will linger despite your recovery.

Not Taking a Stand

Not Taking a Stand

If you never take a stand, they won’t know where you stand. They’ll likely walk all over you and what you believe in because … by not taking a stand … you let them.

But if you take a stand, right at the beginning, articulating your rules, your boundaries, and your expectations, which have to include, either implicitly or explicitly, that above all else everyone is to be respected and listened to – a rule all of us want and know is right – and you show them that you’re not afraid to administer consequences to those who violate the rules … When you show them this, when you take this stand in the first 30 seconds, 5 minutes, and hour of your time with them, they will know where they stand in relation to you.

And they’ll like it. They’ll respect you more for it. For setting boundaries. For letting them know where they stand in relation to you.

When respect is present, it holds steady because people gravitate towards it. They know it’s right.

But be careful: Disrespect can spread like wild fire. And if you don’t take a stand … well … you’re letting the winds of chance dictate what becomes of your classroom learning environment.

So take a stand.

Respect First, Learn Second

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

Hey educators, guess what. What you teach in your classroom won’t matter if there’s no respect.

Let me explain with a story.

If I had to describe my 9th grade math class in a word, it would be ‘scary.’  Every class I was afraid. For starters I was afraid of my teacher. He looked scary, he talked scary, and he often made fun of students who couldn’t produce the correct answer. I’m sure he thought he was being funny.  But I was 14 and he scared the heck out of me. I also dreaded the humiliations and punishments that 4 or 5 students in that class inflicted on the rest of us. Getting drilled in the arm when our teacher wasn’t looking. Pen jabs in the back of the head. Kicks in the shin. Desk weggies. Being called names that I probably shouldn’t repeat here. You know, typical 9th Grade stuff.  And these kids never got in trouble. They weren’t bad kids. If anything, it was developmentally appropriate. But they knew they could get away with it. So they did it. And I dreaded it. When I looked at my Math 9 textbook at home, I only thought about the next class … with fear!

And how much did I learn in that class? Like how much did I really learn?  Zilch.  Nada.  Nothing.

Sure hormones got in the way. Sure a class full of imaginary audiences got in the way. And sure I wasn’t the best at math to begin with. But it’s true, I learned next to nothing in 9th grade math.  But that experience made me a better educator. Why?  Simple:

Respect first, learn second.

Let me explain.  When we perceive a threat, our brains get hijacked by our fight or flight response. Our brains – specifically our amygdala’s – pump adrenaline and other hormones throughout our bodies. We sense the threat, and our brains optimize our bodies for a fight or a flight. Now this is important to understand because the ‘human’ parts of the brain – the parts of our brains that allow us to do human-like things (like learning in schools), are way up in the cloudy-looking part of the brain called the cortex. In fact, there’s a general rule that the closer a part of the brain is to the spinal cord, the more primitive its function is. Breathing, for example, is taken care of by the brain stem (right above the spinal cord). And you can see that the amygdala – our fight or flight center – is way down low with the rest of the primitive brain stuff (for more, click here).

The amygdala is where fear happens ... way down by the brain stem

The amygdala is where fear happens ... way down by the primitive brain stem.

For educators, this is important, especially the word “perceived.” In my 9th grade math class, I was never going to die. My teacher wasn’t going to kill me. I knew my classmates would never beat me to a pulp. But each and every day I was afraid nonetheless. I perceived a threat, and my amygdala got me ready to fight back or run away. My cortex was hijacked. I couldn’t learn a thing.

Had my teacher made us feel comfortable, had my teacher insisted that everyone in the room treat one another with respect, had my teacher punished those who were being disrespectful, none of us would have been as afraid as we were. We would have felt safe (or safer), and we may have been a little more able to learn.

Educators must demand respect in their classrooms. They must be willing to come down hard on students who are being disresptful. And they must – more than anything – be respectful themselves. We can all think back on one or two teachers who we learned so much from. Not necessarily the ones who we liked the most, but the ones we learned lots and lots from. And I’m willing to bet that somewhere near the top of that teacher’s rulebook was a “Be Respectful” rule. It may have been explicit. It may have been implicit. But if you learned lots, I’m betting that you felt safe. You felt respected. You felt dignified. Your cortex was operational. And you learned … a lot.

What’s to Learn if Everything’s Searchable within Seconds?

Sunday, February 8th, 2009

What if we had headsets, or implants, that allowed us to access anything off the internet in less than a second of desiring that information? What use would a teacher be? What would we need schools for?

Last summer (and for the life of me I can’t find the link) I was reading a Fast Company or Fortune magazine article that interviewed Lary Page, one of the Google founders. Page was talking about his (and Google’s) 20-40 year vision of creating search implants that would interact with our minds to help us access whatever information we wanted within minutes (related links here, here, and here).

Granted I don’t think any of us will be around to read the brain implant headlines (if anyone will be); however, this idea does illustrate just how immediately accessible information will be in the coming years?

And yes, information already is instantly available … but the effort we will need to expend to find what we need will decrease and decrease.

So what implications does this have on how we should design our learning environments? What changes are we noticing already?

Think of all the students who don’t get why they have to memorize maps and plot directions when they can just do instant, online map searches.

Think of the stories you’ve read about professors scrambling for a missing fact in lectures and their students finding it quicker than they could with their smart phones.

Think of spreadsheets and calculators and statistical software programs that pump out desired calculations in seconds.

In sum, technology (i.e. the internet) will continue to replace many of the mental steps we need to do to complete a complex task, but it won’t, in my opinion, replace the high level thinking that’s needed to guide learning and discovery needed to complete it. Technology won’t replace what’s needed to make valuable connections between here and there, between what we have and what need to discover, and between what’s important and what’s unimportant.

That “what’s needed” is wisdom and insight.

And this is where the educator will become more and more important as we venture deeper and deeper into the Information Age. If everything’s searchable within seconds, quality educators will be needed to help us answer questions like these:

How do we make sense of all this data?

What can you really do with this map technology?

Why do we need to use that math formula? What will it allow us to do?

What should we be searching for? How do we know if it’s quality?

More than ever, the real value of educators will be in their ability to stay ahead of the curve and pass on their insights with their students. For some time we’ve been told that “Life-Long Learners” will be the ones who will succeed in the Information Age … and now we’re starting to see living proof of this. The best educators, then, will be the best examples of life-long learning – they will be the ones who will have the most to share, the most insights gained, and the most acquired wisdom.

Technology won’t replace educators or lessen their importance. Instead, technology will demand that they constantly learn, really teach … and disseminate less.

Where Are You Going In Life?

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

I start my courses by asking my students the title question. Even when I teach literature or government and economics and history and entrepreneurship … I place huge emphasis on this question. And if I taught math or gym or wood work or basket weaving, I would still place huge emphasis on this question.

Why?

Because my course is about my students, not me.  We all teach because there are people – and often very young and inexperienced little people who have their whole lives ahead of them – who need to learn things from us. Teaching is about our students.

Teaching is not about us.

Teaching is not about our love for our subjects.

Teaching is not about passing or failing or percentages and letter grades.

Real teaching – and I mean the best kind of teaching – is about inspiring our students to become more than they are. To motivate our students to challenge themselves and push themselves harder. To actualize their hidden potential.

But this is the problem. Why would anyone work hard and challenge themselves if they had no sense of where they were headed? They wouldn’t. There would be nothing to work towards.

And this is what I realized in my eighth year of teaching: My course did not matter unless it mattered to my students! “If I cannot make this course meaningful for my students,” I asked myself, “Am I fulfilling my duties as their educator? What does it say about me as a teacher if I cannot help my students understand how this course might relate to their own lives and ambitions?” I really believe that when educators ask themselves questions like these ones, the results can be remarkable. It puts our reason for being into perspective. It makes things clearer. It gives us courage to do things differently. It helps us focus our energies. It helps us make our students’ educational experience with us more meaningful.

*           *            *

COURSE INTRODUCTION + WHERE ARE YOU GOING IN LIFE?

So here’s how I introduce my courses while trying to simultaneously answer these questions. It’s an oversimplification and I’m certain that it’s not the best answer, but I thought it would be fitting to share what I do on this first day of 2009 … a day when many of us are asking what we want out of this new year.

1. Introduce myself, my course, grading weights, yada yada yada. Side Notes: Do any of us really take the first day of classes seriously? What’s really the point of the typical introduction?  It’s kind of like a bunch of wolves sniffing one another, marking territory, and getting an intuitive sense of who’s who and what’s to come. I challenge every educator to make their course introduction more meaningful than the typical one. Think about whether or not your course intro is any different than a bunch of pack animals sniffing one another and marking territory.

2. Draw a 100 year line across the board. I would always start the 100 year line so that the date of birth of the oldest looking student would be showing (e.g. 1989), and then indicate where every ten years would be on the line. E.g. 1991—-2001—-2011– … –2091. I would make my students create their own version of this line too. I would mark an “x” on the current year (e.g. 2009) and say, “We are here.” And then I would ask my students, “Where on this line would you like to die?” Some would ask, “Uh, what does this have to do with civics, or economics, or entrepreneurship?” And I would reply, “It has everything to do with you being in this civics, economics, or entrepreneurship course,” because it does. Understanding and feeling the finiteness of our lives helps instill a sense of urgency. And urgency helps motivate us to do a bit more than we would otherwise.

3. Students mark their ages and life-predictions on the ten-year intervals. Then I would ask my students to indicate how old they would be on each of the ten year intervals. E.g. 0 yrs in 1991, 10 yrs. in 2001, etc. Then, I would ask them – if they could imagine their dream life – to write what kind of day they would be waking up to in each of the ten year intervals, in two sentences or less. Who would they be? What would they be doing? Who would be in their lives? Why? Etc. Then, after a few minutes I would interrupt them and move to step 4.

4. Ask them, “How can this course help you achieve your dreams?” This step is the whole point of the exercise. I wanted my students to start thinking about where they wanted to go and who they wanted to become. I wanted them to want something really, really bad. I wanted them to get excited about that dream life of theirs … excited enough that they might even be willing to consider working hard for it. And I wanted them to realize that their experience in my course was part of that journey. And I would tell them that this course would likely not be a big part of their path forward, but a part nonetheless. I wanted them to understand where it fit into their own grand scheme of things.

5. First Homework Assignment. And after making points like this and many others, I would make steps 3 and 4 their first homework assignment. They would have the rest of the class to think about what their dream life would look like in 10 year snapshots. They would have the rest of the class to review my course outline to see how the content might relate to their future path and future needs. And this whole process, assuming they took it seriously (which most did), was an exercise in making my course more meaningful for them! It was about them constructing their own purpose and defining what they wanted out of my course.

And it worked!

Risk Taking

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

I have not been practicing what I preach.

I always tried to reward my students for taking risks. Yes, I would admit, our school system beats the ‘risk-taker’ out of them. Yes, I would admit, teachers and tests look for ‘right’ answers. Yes, I would admit, it’s difficult to take risks when our school system prescribes what’s to be learned.

I would, however, do my best to explain that the real world has a wonderful way of rewarding risk-takers. People who ‘put themselves out there,’ who try something new and different, who fight the status quo … these are the people who end up being celebrated and revered by the masses. And who are the masses? The people who were too afraid to take risks themselves. Who else would they be?

It’s a weird paradox, isn’t it?

I try as much as possible to reward my students’ risks. I tell them that within every set-back there is always a seed of equal opportunity and benefit.  I explain that mistakes are magical because they tell us what we need to do differently.

And I have not been practicing this myself the past month.  It’s been over a month since my first post. I’ve been waiting for the features and configurations on this blog to be perfect before I really got started. I wanted things to be perfect first. I was using perfect to avoid a risk. I was making up excuses to avoid putting myself out there.

I was also waiting to write something profound. I wanted to write something that would light up the blogosphere. And then I reread a quote I have hanging on my bulletin board above my desk:

“Do not wait; the time will never be ‘just right.’ Start were you stand, and work with whatever tools you may have at your command, and better tools will be found as you go along.” – Napoleon Hill

How can I (or any of us) ask things of others (especially our students) when we’re not willing to do them ourselves?